…shabab khan | Kanpur
It is now more than three months since widespread anger erupted against gender violence in India, sparked off by the horrific assault on a young woman in a New Delhi bus. The protests were welcome. Some ambitiously described them as an Indian version of the Arab Spring, which had begun with a random incident as well—the self-immolation of a fruitseller in Tunisia— but eventually toppled old autocrats in many countries in the region.
Remember Anna Hazare? Everybody, excluding me, wanted to go for a ‘Hunger Strike’, and “Corruption” was the hottest word. Today we don’t even know where that Lil man in topi came from, and what happened to that Bill, for what an ex Army Major chooses Anna came? Do we care guys?
O’ No ! is the the answer. We have other news to peep in. Thakrey Died, MumbaiBandh, Girl arrested for updating fb status and another clicking on LIKE button; Skirmish shelling on LoC, Shah Rukh Khan statement misinterpreted, Shiv sena rally, Facebook Graph Search, Afzal Guru Hanging, Curfew in Jammu… Well, why did we stick on Delhi girl or Anna?
Is it Indian Media, operating our brain’s cells to decide whats right whats wrong. Public attention is already drifting away towards new issues, led by the excitable television broadcasters.
Many would be tempted to describe this lack of sustained interest in any issue as a typical Indian failing. It is not, as a grea political scientist pointed out in a delightful essay more than four decades ago.
He said that public attention towards any important issue tends to rise and fall in five distinct stages:
“Public perception of most
‘crises’ in Indian domestic life does not reflect changes in real conditions as much as it reflects the operation of a systematic cycle of heightened public interest and then incre- asing boredom with major issues.
. . .This ‘issue attention cycle’ is rooted both in the nature of certain domestic problems and in the way major communication media interact with the public”.
Downs delineated five stages in the cycle of public attention.
The first stage is when a social problem exists but has not yet captured
public attention; often, the
problem is more severe at this first stage than it is when it later grabs public attention.
The second stage of alarmed
discovery is accompanied by
breezy optimism that the
problem can be solved in a relatively short time, often
with a new law.
The third stage is when
citizens realize that solutions are costly, often to
themselves. For example, we all love to complain about
traffic till we realize that part of the solution is leaving the car at home so that one can take public transport.
The fourth stage sees a gradual decline in public interest: Some people realize that change will hurt them; others get discouraged; most fall prey to boredom.
The fifth stage is “a twilight realm of lesser attention or spasmodic recurrences of interest.”
Public attention is now
generally low, almost on a par with the level of attention in the first stage. But there is one important difference:
New institutions, government
programmes and policies could sometimes have been put in place when public interest in a particular issue was high.
There are three characteristics
of the issues that go through such an attention cycle:
– They affect a numerical minority, either a powerful minority, or a numerical majority benefits from the system that generates the problem, and the issue does not produce dramatic events on a sustained basis.
Downs was essentially describing what happens in the US—consider the recent rise and fall of the Occupy Wall Street movement—but his fascinating essay gives us a useful framework to consider the prospects of any sustained civic and policy action on gender violence. One can also use his framework to understand the attention cycle in India on other issues such as malnutrition, urban chaos, farmer suicides and
Of course, every cause is not a lost cause. The sustained effort by the right to food campaign to keep its agenda in the public eye is a case study of successful activism.
The role of the media is
important here. “A problem must be dramatic and exciting to maintain public interest because news is ‘consumed’ by much of the public (and by publics everywhere) largely as a form of entertainment.”
As such, it competes with other types of entertainment for a share of each person’s time, Downs wrote, in a harsh
indictment of journalism.
Public attention in India does
seem to follow the cycle that
Downs described. The media
plays an important role in
drawing attention to a social
problem, but then its own unrelenting quest to create
artificial excitement leads it to settle for vacuous studio
debates while reporters scour around for the next fix to be administered to the great Indian public.